I Don’t Like Labels (Part 1)

It seems everyone in our country wants to wear a label. Designer labels identify the shirt, slacks, or blouse. If you are what you wear, then I’m a polo player with a brother named Brooks, and an uncle named Orvis. Slogans on t-shirts indicate a school, philosophy, musician, or host of other things you want to be affiliated with. Right now I’m wearing a shirt that says, “Wait a minute… I need to put on my ‘Gosh I really care’ face.”

We have labels in politics. Red states and blue states. Conservative, liberal, or moderate. Pro-defense or soft on defense. Pro-life or pro-abortion. Labels determine the way we vote.

Muslims have labels. They are divided into Shiite, Sunni, Wahhabi, Druze, and others. From what I can tell, they don’t like each other. If Islam is a religion of love and peace, it’s a denial of many of the teachings of their leader.

But, wait. Let’s not ignore the church labels. We’re no different in the church. We tag each other with labels. Let me see if I can name just a few. We have people who are Reformed, Charismatic, Pentecostal, Fundamentalist, Independent, Pre-millennial, Amillennial, Pre-tribulation rapture, Mid- tribulation rapture, Post-tribulation rapture, Covenant theology, Arminian, Calvinist, Dispensational, Evangelical, Conservative, Liberal, Orthodox, Neo-Orthodox, Unorthodox, Spirit-filled, Deeper Life, Universalist, Existential, Baptist, American Baptist, General Baptist, Primitive Baptist, Southern Baptist Methodist, Presbyterian, Catholic, Episcopal, Lutheran, Anglican, Church of God, Church of Christ, Church of England, Pentecostal Holiness, Assembly of God, Evangelical Free, Mennonite.

NO WONDER PEOPLE ARE CONFUSED! We’ve got more labels than there are angels on the head of a pin. Enough already. You should get the point.

We seem to have more labels than any group on the planet. I guess it’s because of the influence of Vance Havner that I resist and despise labels. Havner said, “If the church would only be the church – if Christians would only be Christians – nothing could halt our onward march.” As it is, the church in America is dying and has no real impact on the culture. We’re so busy trying to covert others to our theological positions we aren’t converting the lost to Christ.”

All through my ministry I’ve had people try to convince me to come to their position. Charismatics want me to have the gift. Calvinists want me to be a five pointer. Dispensationalists want me to pledge my loyalty to the Scofield Bible. The King James crowd wants me to preach out of the authorized text. I always ask them, “Authorized by whom? A pagan king?”

For years when I was in student ministry, I had to fight with people over using only denominational material. I came to the conclusion, if it didn’t come out of Nashville (our Baptist Vatican) it wasn’t of God. Lord, help us when we are so narrow-minded.

It seems that some folks are more committed to their opinions, positions, and experiences than they are to Jesus. Having been won to Christ, they are then converted to a certain belief system within Christianity. Rather than focusing on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith, they become teachers, evangelists, and disciples of a teaching/doctrine/experience and not of Jesus Christ. The secondary becomes the primary. When that happens, we lose the power.

Any books, ideas, person, teaching, or experience that is placed in a position of authority, preeminence, honor, or love above the Lord Jesus is at best a misplaced priority and at worse borders on a lack of balance or possible error and heresy.

I believe our pursuit of and pride in labels is a sign of our failure to understand the Word and our Lord. I believe labeling is something that is dividing the body and pleasing our enemy Satan.

The Bible is not a systematic theology. It’s a story. It’s the story of God’s love for man. Jesus told parables. He didn’t teach a systematic theology. Yes, there is a systematic theology in the Scriptures, but it wasn’t written as a text book for seminaries. It was written so common people could have a relationship with a holy God, not so they could get a degree.

The common people heard Jesus gladly. He (not the Pharisees and Scribes who had it all figured out) taught “as one who had authority.” Apparently, the cold, dead, formalized, “got it all figured out with little room for mystery or doubt” crowd didn’t impress the people. Jesus came to seek and save the lost, not debate with people full of themselves.

I like what Havner said, “Let Bible believers go right on enjoying the meat of the Word, leaving the bones to the theologians.” I have a dear friend who teaches in one of our Baptist schools. He is a Calvinist, but when his students start to ask him about all of that he responds, “I just teach the Bible. If you want to discuss that, you’ll need to take a theology class. I just teach the text.”

People have asked me if Ron Dunn was Reformed or a Calvinist. In reality, I don’t know. As close as we were, He never talked about it. He just preached the Word. It is sad to me that because someone believes in the Sovereignty of God, people make automatic assumptions about what theological camp they are in. EVERY Jew in the Old Testament believed in the Sovereignty of God and most of them couldn’t spell it or write it.

In fact, on subjects like the Sovereignty of God or the filling of the Holy Spirit, we need to be careful that we do not define these things according to our preferences and selected texts. Blessed are the balanced and blessed are those who don’t think they’ve got God in a box.

Acts 11 deals with the church in Antioch. I love what it says in verse 26, “And for an entire year they met with the church and taught considerable numbers; and the disciples were first called Christians in Antioch.” The church grew, evangelized, made disciples, and taught the Scriptures and unbelievers called them “Christians.” The only label that matters is whether the world knows we love Jesus. All other labels are, in my humble and accurate opinion, unnecessary and do not bring glory to Christ.

Christ is the great divider. He divides those who are for Him or against Him. We don’t need to be divided on secondary things. There’s room for disagreement about things we aren’t even certain about. Any man that thinks he can explain the omnipotent, omniscient, infinite, eternal God is deluded. God’s ways are not our ways. His brain is bigger than ours. We are limited, fallen, and finite.

 

3 thoughts on “I Don’t Like Labels (Part 1)

  1. Exactly! I don’t like being referred as a Calvinist or Arminianist, or dispensationalist, progressive dispensationalist, split-dispensationalist, reformed theology, covenant theology, a progressive, traditionalist, old-pather, amillinialist, premillinialist, postmillinialist, pre, post, a, or split rapture, fundamentalist, evangelical, neoevangelical, conservative evangelical, progressive evangelical, theist, liberation theologian, non denominational Baptist Catholic Lutheran, Presbyterian, interdenominational Pentecostal, emergent, emerging, protestant, para-church, or ish . . . anything else because the list could go on and on and on!

    Why? Because it’s too easy to end up defending and promoting a theological position or denomination system rather than proclaiming our Lord and Risen Savior.

    How about, “I am trying to be a Bible believing Christ-Follower who enjoys God in all I do worshiping Him every day?”

    Great article Michael!

  2. Agree with you pastor. In Malaysia, apart from what have been you said in your entry above there is denominations call Borneon Evangelical Church (missionary came from Australia) , The Protestant CHurch in Sabah (missionary came from Germany), The Calvary Church (I am not sure where did missionary came from), etc etc. As me myself I was born and raised in the Protestant but I grew spiritually through The Borneon Evangelical Church.

    There is some argument for example the way to baptist people. In Protestant, a baby can be baptized through the faith of his/her parents while for the Borneon Evangelical Church baptism only allowed when you are 12 years old above and most importantly the person whom to be baptized should understand why he want to be baptized. And some church just put a little drops of water at your forehead and declare your baptization whereas some church they follow how Jesus baptized that is fully drown inside the water. (baptizo)

    So this have been questioned by all the leaders of each denominations at Malaysia and what I heard is that they agree whatever it is they will not question any in similarities in doctrin of the church.

    But I believed that what we should look into is the bible itself. What God says about baptism (for example).

    But what really important is that, no matter what denominations you from, BIBLE what would be the final and ultimate referance for all the Christian. I dont know much about doctrin as i m not a graduate from any theological school. But i believe the BIBLE should be enough.

    Thank you pastor.

  3. Some years ago I was going to a Catholic church. I went to visit friends and went to their church that Sunday. I forget the denomination. One lady asked me, “What church do you go to.” I told her I normally go to a Catholic church. She said, “Too bad you’re not a Christian.”

    It just blows me away how we hate to be labeled and yet that’s exactly what we do. We just don’t like being labeled something we think we aren’t. If I have to pick a label then it would be, “A helpless sinner saved by the Lord Jesus Christ.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *